Difference between revisions of "Tech law seminar on reconceptualizing enforcement"
From NewlyPossible.org
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Class 02 == | == Class 02 == | ||
# Reflect on how you solve problems. Create a flow chart showing your problem-solving process. | # Reflect on how you solve problems. Create a flow chart showing your problem-solving process. | ||
− | # Read the [[Tech law syllabus|syllabus]] | + | # Read the [[Tech law syllabus|syllabus]]. |
− | # Read [https://pclive.peacecorps.gov/pclive/index.php/pclive-resources/resource-library/2325-small-grants-program-me-resources-for-small-grants/file Peace Corps Theory of Change and Logic Model] | + | # Read [https://pclive.peacecorps.gov/pclive/index.php/pclive-resources/resource-library/2325-small-grants-program-me-resources-for-small-grants/file Peace Corps Theory of Change and Logic Model]. |
− | # Read John Gilmore et al., [https://www.barkergilmore.com/blog/four-reasons-lawyers-fail-to-be-viewed-as-strategic-advisors/ Four Reasons Lawyers Fail to be Viewed as Strategic Advisors] | + | # Read John Gilmore et al., [https://www.barkergilmore.com/blog/four-reasons-lawyers-fail-to-be-viewed-as-strategic-advisors/ Four Reasons Lawyers Fail to be Viewed as Strategic Advisors]. |
− | # Read Ben W. Heineman, Jr., William F. Lee, and David B. Wilkins, [https://clp.law.harvard.edu/assets/Professionalism-Project-Essay_11.20.14.pdf Lawyers as Professionals and as Citizens: Key Roles and Responsibilities in the 21st Century] (pages 9 to 16) | + | # Read Ben W. Heineman, Jr., William F. Lee, and David B. Wilkins, [https://clp.law.harvard.edu/assets/Professionalism-Project-Essay_11.20.14.pdf Lawyers as Professionals and as Citizens: Key Roles and Responsibilities in the 21st Century] (pages 9 to 16 only). |
− | # Read [https://publichealth.gsu.edu/files/2020/07/Questions-Using-Blooms-Taxonomy-Key.pdf Questions for the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy] | + | # Read [https://publichealth.gsu.edu/files/2020/07/Questions-Using-Blooms-Taxonomy-Key.pdf Questions for the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy]. |
− | # Read [https://newlypossible.org/courses/technology/2021-SidewalkRules-Manual.pdf Sidewalk Manual] (created by the 2021 Technology Law class) | + | # Read [https://newlypossible.org/courses/technology/2021-SidewalkRules-Manual.pdf Sidewalk Manual] (created by the 2021 Technology Law class). |
− | # Read [https://newlypossible.org/courses/technology/2021-SidewalkRules-Intro.pdf Sidewalk Manual] ( | + | # Read [https://newlypossible.org/courses/technology/2021-SidewalkRules-Intro.pdf Sidewalk Manual] (the instructions I gave to the 2021 class). |
# Did your predecessors succeed? | # Did your predecessors succeed? | ||
# What questions would you ask them? | # What questions would you ask them? |
Revision as of 17:48, 6 January 2022
Key links
Class 01
- Create a list of 100 potential future technologies. (If you use any sources, cite them.) Bring a printed copy to class.
Class 02
- Reflect on how you solve problems. Create a flow chart showing your problem-solving process.
- Read the syllabus.
- Read Peace Corps Theory of Change and Logic Model.
- Read John Gilmore et al., Four Reasons Lawyers Fail to be Viewed as Strategic Advisors.
- Read Ben W. Heineman, Jr., William F. Lee, and David B. Wilkins, Lawyers as Professionals and as Citizens: Key Roles and Responsibilities in the 21st Century (pages 9 to 16 only).
- Read Questions for the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy.
- Read Sidewalk Manual (created by the 2021 Technology Law class).
- Read Sidewalk Manual (the instructions I gave to the 2021 class).
- Did your predecessors succeed?
- What questions would you ask them?