Difference between revisions of "Tech law seminar on reconceptualizing enforcement"
From NewlyPossible.org
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Key links == | == Key links == | ||
| − | [[Tech law syllabus]] | + | # [[Tech law syllabus]] |
| + | |||
== Class 01 == | == Class 01 == | ||
# Create a list of 100 potential future technologies. (If you use any sources, cite them.) Bring a printed copy to class. | # Create a list of 100 potential future technologies. (If you use any sources, cite them.) Bring a printed copy to class. | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 6 January 2022
Key links
Class 01
- Create a list of 100 potential future technologies. (If you use any sources, cite them.) Bring a printed copy to class.
Class 02
- Reflect on how you solve problems. Create a flow chart showing your problem-solving process.
- Read the syllabus
- Read Peace Corps Theory of Change and Logic Model
- Read John Gilmore et al., Four Reasons Lawyers Fail to be Viewed as Strategic Advisors
- Read Ben W. Heineman, Jr., William F. Lee, and David B. Wilkins, Lawyers as Professionals and as Citizens: Key Roles and Responsibilities in the 21st Century (pages 9 to 16)
- Read Questions for the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
- Read Sidewalk Manual (created by the 2021 Technology Law class)
- Read Sidewalk Manual (my initial message introducing the 2021 project)
- Did your predecessors succeed?
- What questions would you ask them?
