Difference between revisions of "Law and Technology"
From NewlyPossible.org
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# innovation law in the narrow traditional sense (i.e., intellectual property law) | # innovation law in the narrow traditional sense (i.e., intellectual property law) | ||
# relationship between law and technology (e.g., robot law, history of railroad law) | # relationship between law and technology (e.g., robot law, history of railroad law) | ||
− | # legal implications of new technologies (e.g., | + | # legal implications of new technologies (e.g., legality of electronic surveillance) |
# use of new technologies in the practice of law (e.g., electronic discovery in litigation) | # use of new technologies in the practice of law (e.g., electronic discovery in litigation) | ||
# provision of legal services through new technologies (e.g., automated online wills) | # provision of legal services through new technologies (e.g., automated online wills) |
Revision as of 12:09, 30 October 2020
This is my rough taxonomy to understand what people (particularly students) mean when they say "law and technology":
- innovation law in the narrow traditional sense (i.e., intellectual property law)
- relationship between law and technology (e.g., robot law, history of railroad law)
- legal implications of new technologies (e.g., legality of electronic surveillance)
- use of new technologies in the practice of law (e.g., electronic discovery in litigation)
- provision of legal services through new technologies (e.g., automated online wills)
- code/technology as law (e.g., programmable rules of the road)
- competency in the technologies that law will confront (e.g., basics of machine learning)
- use of new technologies in legal education (e.g., classes with augmented reality)
- policymaking for new technologies (e.g., advocating for different liability rules for internet platform companies)