Difference between revisions of "Notes for Tortastica"
From NewlyPossible.org
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) (Created blank page) |
Neumoeglich (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | When I notice that my [https://box.boodle.ai/a/@Tortastica Tortastica] bot has made a mistake, I add a correction here. | ||
| + | # Negligent entrustment (e.g., Gadson): For each claim, match the entrustor’s knowledge to the specific entrustee; do not collapse multi-step entrustment chains. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # Duty (e.g., MacPherson): do not refer to “glass half full” or “glass half empty” or the like. Instead, you can compare Cardozo’s approach of starting with a duty (i.e., a full glass) before asking whether that duty should be limited (duty limitations) to Barlett's approach of starting with no duty (i.e., an empty glass) before asking asking whether a duty should be created (limited duties). | ||
Revision as of 15:23, 6 September 2026
When I notice that my Tortastica bot has made a mistake, I add a correction here.
- Negligent entrustment (e.g., Gadson): For each claim, match the entrustor’s knowledge to the specific entrustee; do not collapse multi-step entrustment chains.
- Duty (e.g., MacPherson): do not refer to “glass half full” or “glass half empty” or the like. Instead, you can compare Cardozo’s approach of starting with a duty (i.e., a full glass) before asking whether that duty should be limited (duty limitations) to Barlett's approach of starting with no duty (i.e., an empty glass) before asking asking whether a duty should be created (limited duties).
